Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 License.

5.02.2006

-Yes U. Si/We S. Se/Can A. Puede

Had I found an opportunity to engage in conversation with a marcher, I might have asked the man citing Jesus to consider a re-examination of Matthew 22. But such a request would likely have been met with a chant, or a challenge. Orlando's May Day immigrant march, like those in any city, was not about debate or dialogue--it was about numbers, and feelings.

Whoever is responsible for counting at these events stumbled a bit on the job, using a margin of error in the thousands in reporting the number of marchers. From my perspective at the edge of Lake Eola Park, all I can share with certainty is that the parade of souls took 45 minutes or more to pass my park bench. Let's use 25, 000.

As with the other rally I attended recently, I went as a witness. In neither case would I count myself a neutral observer, but I carried no signs and failed to chant, even a little. Because I arrived at Lake Eola rather early, I joined professional witnesses from the Sanford Herald and Orlando Sentinel awaiting the marchers under the park's shade trees. We small-talked about the route, and how one can gauge a march's progress by the movement of the helicopters. At least three on-site broadcast vans were parked on the grass near us to provide complementary close-ups to the helicopter long shots.

The Sentinel reporter interviewed me at length about the day's events. My ideas, unfortunately, were not presented in the next day's print edition. That was my first, and likely last Sentinel purchase. Not that I had anything all that original or innovative to say, but I would have liked seeing it in print.

I can not remember where I first heard mention of the rally. We do a pretty good job of ignoring the local news, so it was not on television. Likely talk radio did the job--that's pretty much all I hear when driving a car.

Sheryl also found a printed sheet on the street in front of our house, and brought it inside. Black smudges of tire-track or sneaker-print cover each side, but the message is still quite legible. Addressed to a "Patriotic American", the sheet spews sterotypical "us" and "them" dualism, using the word "illegal" four times and specifying Mexicans twice. If you live here, and are worried that, "THEY ARE PUSHING US AROUND IN OUR OWN COUNTRY! !", you may wish to call your senators. I think the numbers provided for Bill Nelson and Mel Martinez were the only objectively factual pieces of information that the sheet provided.

I certainly heard about the planned "anti" rally scheduled for 12:00 at the corner of routes 436 and 50. About 5 minutes before noon, I was driving through that intersection. The row of evenly-spaced American flags on two corners tricked me into believing I had found a very well-ogranized group. The only gathering behind the flags, however, was a collection of late model used cars. I continued driving toward downtown Orlando.

Police and reporters coalesced with me around the 6 counter-demonstrators at the corner of Eola Drive and Robinson. I can't really define what it is that draws me to these folks--likely, it is a desire to see them confronted, and the threat of violence and retribution that possibility generates. The woman in blue is the Sentinel reporter with whom I spoke. I believe the man doing the video-camera interview was from the local NBC affiliate. The sentiments on the signs the antis carried align pretty well with those on my tread-stained flyer. None are articulate, nuanced or even particularly clever, though one man arranged his placards with such care that he was able to alternate between six different messages. All of them inspired frenzied chanting and pointing from the marchers. If it were not for the pacifying presence of two bike cops and an organizer in an orange vest, the potential for violence would certainly have been realized. I saw one rock the size of an acorn hit a sign, and a chip of bark land at the feet of the sign-carriers. I am pretty sure I am the only one who noticed.

Using rough math, the counter-demonstrators near me made up approximately 0.024% of the Orlando-area residents who felt strongly enough to skip work and/or bother to show up downtown to make their feelings known. Sort of a pathetic showing, really, until one considers that many of those who might have come did not because they could not, or because they were frightened.

They poke up from below--our flyer-making, sign-waving, counter-demonstrating neighbors--the tip of a popular sentiment iceberg. To say it plainly, part of what draws me to those folks is their verve, their nerve, their balls (to put it baldly) in standing up for wildly outnumbered beliefs. They are wrong and the tide runs against them, but they soldier on--they all smoked, too, as far as I could tell. "Got Green Card" guy is a Marlboro man--you can see them in his pocket. I am pretty sure he got some above-the-fold quotes in the Sentinel.

What is more difficult to admire is the ignorance and truculence these people represent. My hope for an equitable solution falters in the face of radio hosts whose alliterative insults dismiss participants as "marching Mexicans" or the "hispanic horde". I can admire strongly-held feelings more easily when they are even remotely defensible.

They're frightened, after all. Hiding under layers of connotation, our fear of the "horde" resists daylight. Only the brave and misguided few here in Orlando were willing to give it small voice. We couch our fear of the other (you remember, from the flier--us and them) in economic, cultural and labor terms. They're stealing our jobs [direct quote from the flyer], soaking up all the welfare money--meanwhile, they want bi-lingual classes in our schools and I have to choose English to use an ATM! What the fuck is that?

You say "horde", I think ostrogoths, visigoths and vandals. Rape and pillage.

I'm no Solomon. In this instance, I'm not even a particularly constructive critic. To all concerned, I'd say this: Put your signs away. Forever. If protests were ever efficacious, those days have gone, unless the goal is a strong dose of self-righteousness. What, in a tangible, measurable sense, was achieved by all that marching? A sign, or hundreds of them bobbing in tandem, are about as effective at changing minds as bumper stickers.

Demonstrations and signs are not bad tools--they are just the wrong tools. You know the old saw about all problems looking like nails to the person holding a hammer? Because we don't know what to do with our beliefs or which tools we should be holding to get to work, (or even if we do) you and I are left to rely on the law-makers. Pragmatism and compromise will rule the day.

We can be very sure that the millions will not be rounded up and deported. I think we can be similarly certain that universal amnesty is a real long shot. Whatever else happens, there will surely be more signs, flyers, marches and bumper stickers. Enough . . .

Try some phone calls and e-mails, if you like. I hear congressional aides get after their senators and representatives when the messages really pour in.

1 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

No More Protests! No More Protests! No More Protests!. Let's have an anti protest protest, and maybe after we can meet at a coffee house and talk about the inequities while listening to bad slam poetry. I agree protests don't work anymore, it seems as though we have collectively realized that the easist thing to do is not acknowledge protestors, and not too long after they go away. Let's be honest folks we're too busy for social causes (yeah I'm a jerk... I know).
I went to college in a very political place (DC) and it seemed as though there was a protest every other day. My experience/involvement with them is limited. In one case I was sitting with a friend drinking beers hidden in paper bags while the muslim student leaque/association/chapter protested american involvement in Israel. It was a particularly theatrical event which included carboard cut outs of airplanes running simmulated bombing runs and students wearing cardboard tanks pretending to shoot at innocent bystanders (both the planes and the tanks clearly said "United States"). For myself and my friend it was a great, we slowly got drunk on a sunny day the protest got increasingly funny. Looking back on it I can say that the event was rather sad. I am by no means deriding those involved, in fact I am impressed by people who feel strongly enough about something that it drives them to protest; this feeling is foreign to me. I think that I look at this event as sad because it was widely regarded a comical. Most students simply went about their business on their way to class giving the protestors hardly a second glance, save for those laughing (myself included). Again I had nothing against the people involved or the sentiment, I just found the whole spectical funny because of the methods utilized. It was amazing to me that people so opinionated about such a charged issue had resorted to circus side-show theatrics. It almost seemed as though the peopole involved were making light of the issue. The protest drew some media attention, but it is likely that they only showed up because their was nothing more sensational to report that day. I remember seeing reporters interviewing students, but was drunk by the time it aired and I didn't bother watching to see the final product. The end result of the protest was..... NOTHING!
Protests don't work anymore. I saw many others during my time in DC. In fact almost every weekend during the spring there was some group protesting something on the mall. Yet nothing changed. I wonder about peolple who participate in protests. Do they not realize that their actions will result in nothing but a media blip? Maybe they fancy themselves disciples of the sixties when protesting and student movements where a completely novel concept and social activism was somewhat effective. Whether or not this is the case, it is hard to host an effective sit in when everyone needs to be back at the office monday morning. Looking back at my time in DC it seems that now people only protest when it doesn't interfere with their ability to attend class or make money to finance the lives of the 2.7 future protesters that they are rearing.
Ok I'll admit, that blanket statement is unfair. Once during my time in Washington I had the misfortune of walking through a WTO protest. It was a group of kids who would probably consider themsleves nuvo hippies or some other self reverential term. This was a group of full time protestors who traveled the country/world demonstrating against this or that. I remeber that there were some kids at our campus looking for a place to crash for a few nights, protesting was their gig. I was walking home from a girlfriend's apartment and chose a path that took me past the GAP. I noticed a huge croud of kids (wearing those oh so hip anti consumer I made this myself clothes and sporting the uber i'm-tring-too-hard white dreadlocks.) Long story short I was on the cop's side of the street and made the mistake of asking a cop what was going on. I was told to keep walking. As I walked away I thought to myself that these kids were not going to stop any G-town fashionista from picking up that week's "essential" khakis, and for that matter they weren't going to change anyone's mind either. I wondered when their parents would cut them off and they would have to get a job working for one of the huge evil corporations that they so despised. I wondered if they would sit in their cubes and intentionally screw up minor tasks as a sort of last ditch rebellion in an effort to undermine the "man". I wonder these things while silmultaneously acknowledging that I am a cynical asshole.

Fri May 05, 12:08:00 AM EDT  

Post a Comment

<< Home